In a 5-4 decision written by Justice John Paul Stevens, the court said that federal sentencing rules violate defendants' right to a jury trial by allowing judges — rather than juries — to decide on factors that can increase sentences beyond certain ranges.

But a separate 5-4 majority, led by Justice Stephen Breyer, said the rules designed by Congress to bring uniformity and fairness to punishments shouldn't be junked. Instead, they should be considered by judges on an advisory basis rather than as mandates.

The seemingly contradictory opinions created widespread uncertainty over the federal sentencing system and could lead thousands of convicts to flood courts across the nation with appeals of their sentences.

So, how does this ruling affect our favourite Domestic Diva? Well, appeals courts should now ensure that sentences are reasonable. This recommendation affects federal defendants whose cases are pending, or those who have yet to complete their first appeal. Ms. Stewart falls into the latter category. Her lawyers are considering their options (Newsday.com).

Now, since Ms. Stewart is due to leave prison in early March, this discussion may be entirely moot. But frankly, it can't be a moment too soon! Have you seen Martha Stewart Living's new TV Show, Everyday Food? It's terrible! (Although, I'm more of a Nigella Lawson fan myself.)

Image courtesy of SaveMartha.com.